Part Four of a year-end email conversation with Peter Hum, Jim Macnie, Giovanni Russonello and Greg Thomas (Jump to: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 )
From: Giovanni Russonello
Astrid Riecken/FTWP
Hi Nate, Peter, Greg and Jim,
It’s been a joy reading everyone’s posts so far. First off, I
have to thank all of you, my “elders” in this jazz writing game, for all the
inspiration that your work has provided me over the years. It’s a thrill to be
hashing this stuff out with you folks.
I’ve been thinking lately about how jazz has a way of
conveniently marking itself off by decades. How considerate it was of Coleman
Hawkins, say, to record his bebop-auguring “Body and Soul” right as the 1930s
were giving way to the ’40s. Or of all
those luminaries who happened to wait until 1959 to give jazz a
full-body makeover. Or of Miles Davis to release Bitches Brew in 1970, guaranteeing
that the next decade would be given over to jazz-rock fusion. Then there was
Wynton Marsalis, in early 1982, issuing his debut album and ushering in a
decade of phoenix-like bop playing. You get the point.
To me, 2012 was that kind of year. A lot of forces converged to
renegotiate jazz’s place in American culture. I think the 2010s will go down as
the time when open-armed symbiosis with all sorts of art — mostly other music,
but not exclusively — became the governing paradigm. Musicians are crossing boundaries
at a fast clip, yet almost always avoiding the mainstream. That can be both a
good and bad thing.
Nate, in your
wrap-up last year, you noted the “stealth jazz influence” in a lot of the
creative pop music that’s been coming out recently. I think you
were right on in saying that this has the markings of jazz education’s
influence all over it. There’s something else at play now, too: Spotify
memberships became a commonplace this year. So we have to reckon with the
impact of an unprecedented global aqueduct of musical dispersion; it can seem
like everyone is listening to everything.
Most young jazz performers are reaffirming the postmodern
definition of jazz that’s now more or less indisputable, as far as I’m
concerned: Jazz is whatever jazz musicians play. But that hasn’t totally
changed what it means to be a jazz musician; you have to know the
tradition. The music’s finest fruit will always come from those who understand
West African-born rhythm from the inside out, and who understand jazz as
expressing some sort of insurgent ideal. (That’s part of why the #BAM discussion,
which spilled over into 2012, was very much worth having, even if tempers on
both sides — and a blackout from major media — prevented it from blooming.)
Photo: Mike Schreiber
This was the year when we got a full picture of how well jazz’s
foundations can undergird eclectic ventures. To some degree, that’s what was
happening on this year’s two most talked-about records made by jazz musicians:
the Robert Glasper Experiment’s Black Radio and Esperanza
Spalding’s Radio Music Society. The common word in those titles is a
tip-off; I’d argue that the records will end up having a more important effect
on the future of commercial music — principally hip-hop and R&B — than on
that of jazz. But it was still good to see some prominent jazz musicians draw
attention for their interest in other “great American art forms.” Plus, it
points to another upside to all this cross-pollination. A friend of mine said
she came across Black Radio online, when clicking through Erykah Badu’s
catalog. From there, Spotify’s “related artists” feature guided her to a
Christian Scott (aTunde
Adjuah?) record. Who knows where that will lead her.
But when I look back on this year’s harvest, I’m convinced that
albums like Rafiq Bhatia’s Yes It Will (which snuck onto my
top 10 list),or ERIMAJ’s
Conflict of a Man, or even Karriem Riggins’ Alone Together actually tell us
more about the direction jazz is going. These discs, all debuts by musicians
under 40, don’t force any dualistic conceit about fusing two genres; listening
to them can feel like drinking up an ocean of influences.
The goal of Bhatia, Riggins and Jamire Williams of ERIMAJ is
fundamentally the same as any classic jazz player’s: to throw light on the
ironies of struggle, the productive partnership of pain and joy. Sometimes it
can just be easier to evoke those contradictions when your music encompasses
John Coltrane, Soft Machine, Sunn O))), Flying Lotus. (I’m thinking especially
of Bhatia here. Both in concert and on record, I am thrilled by how his music
can be so simultaneously summit-seeking and fastidious.)
If this is where we’re headed, it makes sense that Jason Moran
seems to be the hottest name on the lips of jazz fans these days. After Dr.
Billy Taylor died, Moran took over as artistic advisor for jazz at the Kennedy
Center here in D.C. This past October marked the beginning of his first season
as a jazz curator, and its scope has been something to celebrate. So far, he’s
held an election night jam session with bluegrass musicians and opera singers
sharing the stage with his own sextet; converted an area of the stately center
into a dark-lit dance hall for a Medeski, Martin & Wood show; and presented
a “KC Jazz Club” concert by Christie Dashiell, a young, adventurous singer from
D.C. who’s relatively unknown on the national stage.
It takes a while for fundamental changes in the music to seep up
into major performing arts institutions, so when you see the Kennedy Center
already opening its arms to Moran’s experimental approach, you can almost watch
the Young Lions vanishing from the rearview. (I wrote
a piece for CapitalBop comparing his vision to that of Jazz at Lincoln
Center; it might have felt like a potshot, if the differences weren’t so
stark.)
In a JazzTimes profile of Moran earlier this year,
I thought about why he seems ready to bear the music’s standard in an age of
artistic crossbreeding. A big part of it is his embrace not just of varied
musical influences, but of multimedia; at the recent Whitney installation that
you mentioned, Nate, Moran and his wife — the opera singer Alicia Hall Moran —
incorporated music, video, performance art and much else. That’s status quo for
them, and for a growing number of jazz players.
The price of such wide-ranging artistic exploration is, of
course, that you separate yourself from the mainstream. But a place on the
fringe doesn’t connote stagnation. I think it works the other way — freeing you
from certain commercial considerations and making room for straight-up
expression. For once, I feel like jazz is learning to accept those advantages.
The “jazz is dead” conversation now feels like a crude joke that’s been told
too many times: The punch line doesn’t have any bite left. Even the awkwardness
of the suggestion is gone. Jazz isn't dead, it's just spreading its wings.
Nate, to respond to your question, people now seem at peace with the idea that
the jazz tradition is itself a constant innovation.
I don’t mean to suggest that jazz lives in some distant, utopian
world where all mercantile worries vanish. I don’t want to paint the internet
as an absolute plus, either. A struggle for donations and the
technology-triggered decline of radio have quietly eviscerated jazz on the
airwaves in Boston,
Los
Angeles and D.C.
Radio is a force that brings us together, gives people a touchstone, invites
listeners to hear things they wouldn’t otherwise. For those reasons, the medium
is a boon to any marginalized music (or
strain of thought), and it's jarring to watch it disappear.
Still, the web has also empowered folks to think and work
outside the box in helping the music thrive. You guys are right that the
attrition of venues is a serious problem, including in D.C., where U Street
(Black Broadway, as it’s long been known) is down to just two bona fide jazz
clubs. To help make up for that, and build an audience for future clubs,
CapitalBop puts on DIY
shows at non-traditional venues, and we get the word out through our
web presence. We’re far from the only ones. House Party Starting in Chicago,
Search & Restore in New York,
and a handful of similar organizations across the country are filling a need
vacated by disappearing clubs, while showing how the web can help corral young
listeners who are oblivious — but open — to contemporary jazz. (Just before the
Undead Music Festival’s nationwide Night of the Living DIY in June, I wrote
something for A Blog Supreme about the importance of DIY jazz
organizations.)
And as long as we’re talking venues: Greg and Nate, I’m
definitely concerned about the downfall of St. Nick’s Pub in Harlem, and
the future of Lenox Lounge. But as you observed, Greg, there are still a
handful of spots there. And what matters most to me is that the
neighborhood is again a hotbed where a bumper crop of young stars lives, works
and practices together.
I was in the pianist Gerald Clayton’s kitchen a while
back, talking to him for a JazzTimes story on the Harlem
scene, when he got to raving about his roommate, the drummer Justin Brown. He
was talking about the endless wealth of music that’s liable to gust out of
Brown’s computer speakers on a given day: singer-songwriter stuff, Indian
classical, gospel — the gamut. The best part is that when the urge strikes
them, Clayton and Brown get to call any of the dozens of young, professional
musicians living in their neighborhood and convene a living-room jam session.
I’m eager to see how the partnerships between these Harlem players — Clayton,
Brown, Moran, Jamire Williams, Ben Williams, Fabian Almazan, Taylor Eigsti,
Kendrick Scott and plenty more — help them churn something new and intimate out
of their vast collective ken.
All this talk of the future reminds me that I need to pause for
a moment, as you guys have, to recognize the great ones we lost this year: Dave
Brubeck, David S. Ware, Pete La Roca Sims, Pete Cosey, Ted Curson, Shimrit Shoshan,
Austin Peralta and so many others. I only had the chance to experience the
first two of those names live (Brubeck with his quartet, and Ware in a
heart-stirring solo soprano saxophone show), but every artist on that list
calls up a distinct and enthralling sound in my brain. Which reminds me why we
fight for this music: It shows us how to communicate, cooperate, construct,
without ever compromising the essence of what gives us freedom.
Until the next Time Out,
Gio
Recent Comments